I love seeing the creativity and ingenuity that goes into creating small spaces
like this one, but I also feel incredibly ambivalent in living in a space that small full time (though the linked article is actually for an office, but it could just as easily be a marvelous studio). I mean, I don't think I need palatial digs to be happy, but I also feel like these smaller places are designed in mind for people who just don't already own a lot of things.
I remember a while ago, I was marveling at the ingenuity of
this space, a converted pigeon coop, but even as technology gives me the means to dispose of my main space hogs--books, movies and music--there's no provision for holding onto things like your great grandmother's china or the table and chairs that have been in your family for six generations.
And I'm of two minds about it. On the one hand, there's something incredibly freeing about slimming down your possessions that far. I live in fear of picking up my mother's packrat ways. On the moon hand...I feel like you've got to be living a fairly vagabond lifestyle to live in a space that small and not have 'creep', possessions piling up past your ability to comfortably and aesthetically contain them.
(Have I talked about this before? I feel like I've talked about this before.)
Anyway, I love the 'living' space of that office. For those not clicking on the link, it has a three tiered couch made of repurposed pallets. If I were the kind of person who threw formal parties, I could see where it might be a bit awkward, but for a family room or hanging out with fangirls (which I'm far more likely to do), it seems like it would be ideal and incredibly comfortable. SLUMBER PARTY!
Anyway.
So, author NK Jemisin retweeted this link:
Amazon is Discounting Us To DeathAnd...here's my thing(s). I think this article is really aimed more at people IN the publishing industry, people who are making their money and their livelihood off the current publishing model and are, naturally and consequently, very concerned that that model is/may be on its way out.
But as a consumer and reader, the tone of this rubs me very much the wrong way, especially with the, how DARE I not be willing to pay higher prices to be able to do something that is, at the end of the day, a luxury occupation. One that's vital for sanity, imo, but still, one that doesn't feed me or clothe me or give me shelter.
And, as a reader, I don't know that I really SHOULD give a fat flying fuck about the current publishing model crumbling like Ozymandias. I mean, honestly, I don't see MY access to stories and storytelling to be impaired in any particular way if the current publishing industry fails. Fandom will still be there, independent publishing will still be there and be possible, small epresses are cropping up and flourishing all the time. I won't lose anything if HarperCollins or Knopf go under.
And, you know, I do feel sorry for the people who will lose their jobs or will have to go and seek other ways of making their living...but I really have a quite hard time with this whole, "Will someone PLEASE think of the POOR CORPORATIONS??" mindset that seems to be coming from the publishing industry when, at either end, they're really trying to make a profit and I'm not the top priority to either of them except for how I can be extracted for cash.